Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCG vs SCHG
FBCG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FBCG vs SCHG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Price$52.83
Change+$0.58 (+1.11%)
Volume$2.38K
Net Assets5.03B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.79
Change+$0.21 (+0.66%)
Volume$82.94K
Net Assets51.13B
FBCG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCG vs. SCHG commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCG is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 51.1B vs. FBCG (5.03B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than FBCG: SCHG (13.646) vs FBCG (12.959). FBCG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FBCG (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FBCG (0.59). FBCG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FBCG | SCHG | FBCG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.959 | 13.646 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 51.1B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.04 | 1,475% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 3.00 | 1,767% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.35 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBCG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FBCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBCG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBCG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| NVDA - FBCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| AMZN - FBCG | 79% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| ETN - FBCG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| GS - FBCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MS - FBCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||