Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCGX vs RGAGX
FBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FBCGX vs RGAGX
FBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FBCGX (21.1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FBCGX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FBCGX (0.04). FBCGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FBCGX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FBCGX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FBCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FBCGX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.88 vs. RGAGX (10.79). FBCGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.04 vs. RGAGX (21.56).
| FBCGX | RGAGX | FBCGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.162 | 7.534 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 361B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.51 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.88 | 10.79 | 360% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.54 | 46.62 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.04 | 21.56 | 441% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers