Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCGX vs RGAHX
FBCGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FBCGX vs RGAHX
FBCGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCGX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FBCGX (21.7B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FBCGX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FBCGX (0.04). FBCGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FBCGX (9 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FBCGX (0.45) and RGAHX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . FBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FBCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FBCGX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. RGAHX (-0.99). FBCGX return over 5 years is better than : 78.41 vs. RGAHX (13.46).
| FBCGX | RGAHX | FBCGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.44 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.44 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.409 | 8.948 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 353B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.40 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | -0.99 | -1,189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.45 | 44.91 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.41 | 13.46 | 583% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement