Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCGX vs RGEBX
FBCGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FBCGX vs RGEBX
FBCGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FBCGX (21.1B). FBCGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FBCGX (0.04) vs RGEBX (0.00). FBCGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FBCGX (9 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBCGX (0.45). FBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FBCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FBCGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.88 vs. RGEBX (9.39). FBCGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.04 vs. RGEBX (15.95).
| FBCGX | RGEBX | FBCGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.162 | 7.135 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 361B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.88 | 9.39 | 414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.54 | 41.68 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.04 | 15.95 | 596% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement