Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HRLAX (67.6M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than FBCIX: HRLAX (3.14) vs FBCIX (2.89). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: FBCIX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.41 vs. FBCIX (13.51). HRLAX (47.24) and FBCIX (46.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBCIX | HRLAX | FBCIX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.617 | 14.212 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 67.6M | 189,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.51 | 23.41 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.42 | 39.37 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.04 | 47.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers