Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. HRLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HRLAX (76.3M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than FBCIX: HRLAX (3.07) vs FBCIX (2.88). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: FBCIX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. FBCIX (7.85). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. FBCIX (44.28).
| FBCIX | HRLAX | FBCIX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 15.871 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 76.3M | 171,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.07 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 20.01 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.38 | 42.52 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 48.93 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers