Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HRLAX
FBCIX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. HRLAX (76.8M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than FBCIX: HRLAX (3.14) vs FBCIX (2.89). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: FBCIX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.17 vs. FBCIX (12.09). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.50 vs. FBCIX (47.16).
| FBCIX | HRLAX | FBCIX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.698 | 17.842 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 76.8M | 169,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 25.17 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.10 | 48.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.16 | 55.50 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement