Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HRLCX
FBCIX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HRLCX
FBCIX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. HRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HRLCX (76.3M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: FBCIX (2.88) vs HRLCX (2.48). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: FBCIX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. FBCIX (7.85). FBCIX (44.28) and HRLCX (43.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBCIX | HRLCX | FBCIX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.00 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.54 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 15.352 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 76.3M | 171,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.48 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 19.17 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.38 | 39.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 43.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers