Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HRLSX
FBCIX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HRLSX
FBCIX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HRLSX (65.5M). HRLSX pays higher dividends than FBCIX: HRLSX (3.33) vs FBCIX (2.96). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: HRLSX (0) vs FBCIX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. FBCIX (10.47). HRLSX (43.36) and FBCIX (43.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBCIX | HRLSX | FBCIX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.20 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.71 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.839 | 10.320 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 65.5M | 195,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 3.33 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.47 | 18.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 37.47 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | 43.36 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement