Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs MTINX
FBCIX vs MTINX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs MTINX
FBCIX vs MTINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. MTINX (1.18B). FBCIX pays higher dividends than MTINX: FBCIX (2.93) vs MTINX (2.13). FBCIX was incepted earlier than MTINX: FBCIX (6 years) vs MTINX (18 years). MTINX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). FBCIX (50.00) and MTINX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTINX: FBCIX (250) vs MTINX (1000). MTINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.55 vs. FBCIX (12.74). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.64 vs. MTINX (35.36).
| FBCIX | MTINX | FBCIX / MTINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.28 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.32 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.600 | 13.678 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.18B | 10,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.13 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 24.55 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 56.11 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.64 | 35.36 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement