Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs RAZAX
FBCIX vs RAZAX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs RAZAX
FBCIX vs RAZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. RAZAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and RAZAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. RAZAX (604M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than RAZAX: FBCIX (2.88) vs RAZAX (2.33). FBCIX was incepted earlier than RAZAX: FBCIX (6 years) vs RAZAX (9 years). RAZAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). RAZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). RAZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: RAZAX (0) vs FBCIX (250). RAZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. FBCIX (11.48). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. RAZAX (24.32).
| FBCIX | RAZAX | FBCIX / RAZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.33 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.920 | 8.295 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 604M | 21,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.33 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 12.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.94 | 42.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.77 | 24.32 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement