Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMATX (606M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than RMATX: FBCIX (2.96) vs RMATX (2.59). FBCIX was incepted earlier than RMATX: FBCIX (6 years) vs RMATX (9 years). RMATX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). RMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). RMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: RMATX (0) vs FBCIX (250). RMATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. FBCIX (10.68). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.79 vs. RMATX (25.58).
| FBCIX | RMATX | FBCIX / RMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.602 | 6.866 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 606M | 21,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.59 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 13.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 40.34 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.79 | 25.58 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement