Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMATX (605M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than RMATX: FBCIX (2.93) vs RMATX (2.58). FBCIX was incepted earlier than RMATX: FBCIX (6 years) vs RMATX (9 years). RMATX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). RMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). RMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: RMATX (0) vs FBCIX (250). RMATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FBCIX (12.74). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.64 vs. RMATX (26.69).
| FBCIX | RMATX | FBCIX / RMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.600 | 7.713 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 605M | 21,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.58 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 16.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 45.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.64 | 26.69 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement