Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs RMATX
FBCIX vs RMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. RMATX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and RMATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. RMATX (599M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than RMATX: FBCIX (2.88) vs RMATX (2.63). FBCIX was incepted earlier than RMATX: FBCIX (6 years) vs RMATX (10 years). RMATX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). RMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). RMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: RMATX (0) vs FBCIX (250). RMATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.25 vs. FBCIX (7.85). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. RMATX (26.94).
| FBCIX | RMATX | FBCIX / RMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 7.836 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 599M | 21,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 9.25 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.38 | 44.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 26.94 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers