Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs RMGSX
FBCIX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs RMGSX
FBCIX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. RMGSX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and RMGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. RMGSX (601M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: FBCIX (2.88) vs RMGSX (2.54). FBCIX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: FBCIX (6 years) vs RMGSX (10 years). RMGSX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBCIX (50.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBCIX: RMGSX (0) vs FBCIX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. FBCIX (7.96). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. RMGSX (25.77).
| FBCIX | RMGSX | FBCIX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.692 | 7.627 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 601M | 21,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.54 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 9.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.44 | 43.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 25.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement