Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs WMMRX
FBCIX vs WMMRX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs WMMRX
FBCIX vs WMMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCIX vs. WMMRX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCIX is a Hold and WMMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. WMMRX (471M). WMMRX pays higher dividends than FBCIX: WMMRX (6.07) vs FBCIX (2.89). FBCIX was incepted earlier than WMMRX: FBCIX (6 years) vs WMMRX (21 years). WMMRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). FBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMMRX (7.00). FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMRX: FBCIX (250) vs WMMRX (1000). WMMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.56 vs. FBCIX (11.21). FBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.72 vs. WMMRX (33.07).
| FBCIX | WMMRX | FBCIX / WMMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.00 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.37 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.237 | 18.555 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25 | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 471M | 27,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 6.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 22.56 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.35 | 41.47 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.72 | 33.07 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement