Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBDIX vs FSPHX
FBDIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBDIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FBDIX (818M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FBDIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FBDIX (0.00). FBDIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBDIX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBDIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FBDIX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBDIX: FSPHX (0) vs FBDIX (1000). FBDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.20 vs. FSPHX (-15.25). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.73 vs. FBDIX (-17.26).
| FBDIX | FSPHX | FBDIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.63 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.63 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.267 | -2.202 | -875% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 818M | 5.88B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.20 | -15.25 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.95 | 3.92 | 1,276% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.26 | -13.73 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.33 | 35.69 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement