Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBDIX vs FSPHX
FBDIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBDIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FBDIX (987M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FBDIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FBDIX (0.00). FBDIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBDIX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FBDIX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBDIX: FSPHX (0) vs FBDIX (1000). FBDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.65 vs. FSPHX (0.35). FBDIX return over 5 years is better than : -2.64 vs. FSPHX (-8.45).
| FBDIX | FSPHX | FBDIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.63 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.952 | 10.569 | 425% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 6.22B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.65 | 0.35 | 8,473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.97 | 10.51 | 599% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.64 | -8.45 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.66 | 39.39 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement