Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBDIX vs FSPHX
FBDIX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBDIX vs FSPHX
FBDIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBDIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. FBDIX (1.04B). FBDIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBDIX (1.81) vs FSPHX (0.45). FBDIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBDIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBDIX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBDIX: FSPHX (0) vs FBDIX (1000). FBDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.08 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). FBDIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.35 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FBDIX | FSPHX | FBDIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.63 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.569 | -14.447 | -39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 5.78B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 0.45 | 399% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.08 | -2.88 | -1,950% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.78 | -14.19 | -428% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.35 | -23.32 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.46 | 24.79 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement