Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFRX vs HBLRX
FBFRX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FBFRX vs HBLRX
FBFRX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFRX vs. HBLRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFRX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FBFRX (3.46B). FBFRX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FBFRX (4.56) vs HBLRX (2.80). FBFRX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FBFRX (13 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FBFRX (0.59). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FBFRX (42.27). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFRX: HBLRX (0) vs FBFRX (1000000). FBFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. HBLRX (6.28). FBFRX return over 5 years is better than : 22.14 vs. HBLRX (3.69).
| FBFRX | HBLRX | FBFRX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.27 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.27 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.360 | 3.199 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 11.2B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 2.80 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.50 | 6.28 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.61 | 19.12 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.14 | 3.69 | 600% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.23 | 36.81 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement