Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFZX vs HBLRX
FBFZX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs HBLRX
FBFZX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. HBLRX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FBFZX (3.44B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FBFZX (4.50) vs HBLRX (2.80). FBFZX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FBFZX (20 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FBFZX (0.66). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FBFZX (42.27). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: HBLRX (0) vs FBFZX (100000). FBFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.96 vs. HBLRX (5.55). FBFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.77 vs. HBLRX (4.72).
| FBFZX | HBLRX | FBFZX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | 3.475 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 11.2B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.50 | 2.80 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.96 | 5.55 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.93 | 19.01 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.77 | 4.72 | 482% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.84 | 38.19 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement