Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFZX vs HBLRX
FBFZX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs HBLRX
FBFZX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FBFZX (3.39B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FBFZX (4.54) vs HBLRX (2.74). FBFZX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FBFZX (20 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FBFZX (0.66). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FBFZX (42.27). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: HBLRX (0) vs FBFZX (100000). FBFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. HBLRX (1.21). FBFZX return over 5 years is better than : 21.51 vs. HBLRX (3.00).
| FBFZX | HBLRX | FBFZX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.055 | 3.434 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 10.8B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 2.74 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 1.21 | 780% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.04 | 19.66 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.51 | 3.00 | 716% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.89 | 32.49 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement