Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFZX vs RLBAX
FBFZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs RLBAX
FBFZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FBFZX (3.44B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBFZX (4.54) vs RLBAX (1.12). FBFZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBFZX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FBFZX (0.66). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBFZX (42.27). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: RLBAX (250) vs FBFZX (100000). FBFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RLBAX (9.91). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.65 vs. FBFZX (21.92).
| FBFZX | RLBAX | FBFZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.32 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.32 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.958 | 9.042 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 1.12 | 406% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.91 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.96 | 38.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.92 | 27.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.00 | 73.60 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement