Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFZX vs RLBEX
FBFZX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs RLBEX
FBFZX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FBFZX (3.39B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FBFZX (4.54) vs RLBEX (1.77). FBFZX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FBFZX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FBFZX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBFZX (42.27). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: RLBEX (250) vs FBFZX (100000). FBFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. RLBEX (6.52). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. FBFZX (21.51).
| FBFZX | RLBEX | FBFZX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.055 | 8.645 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 1.77 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 6.52 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.04 | 44.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.51 | 32.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.89 | 85.14 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement