Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFZX vs RLBEX
FBFZX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs RLBEX
FBFZX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBFZX (3.43B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FBFZX (4.55) vs RLBEX (1.77). FBFZX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FBFZX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FBFZX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBFZX (42.27). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: RLBEX (250) vs FBFZX (100000). RLBEX (12.69) and FBFZX (12.69) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.54 vs. FBFZX (22.06).
| FBFZX | RLBEX | FBFZX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.428 | 8.926 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 1.77 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.69 | 12.69 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.36 | 40.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.06 | 34.54 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.76 | 84.54 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement