Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs GFACX
FBGKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs GFACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$217.11
Change-$3.20 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.58
Change-$1.08 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.2B
FBGKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. GFACX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. FBGKX (64.4B). FBGKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FBGKX (0.34) vs GFACX (0.00). FBGKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FBGKX (17 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FBGKX (0) vs GFACX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. GFACX (3.39). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 88.11 vs. GFACX (37.11).
| FBGKX | GFACX | FBGKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.567 | 1.286 | -277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.4B | 302B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 3.39 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.34 | 34.74 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.11 | 37.11 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.96 | 49.46 | 402% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement