Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs GFAFX
FBGKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$256.46
Change-$1.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
FBGKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FBGKX (80.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FBGKX: GFAFX (0.29) vs FBGKX (0.28). FBGKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FBGKX (17 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FBGKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.88 vs. GFAFX (16.70). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 86.05 vs. GFAFX (48.30).
| FBGKX | GFAFX | FBGKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.746 | 18.099 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 340B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.88 | 16.70 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.10 | 62.48 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.05 | 48.30 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 281.30 | 103.80 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement