Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs RGAHX
FBGKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs RGAHX
FBGKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FBGKX (103B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FBGKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FBGKX (0.00). FBGKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FBGKX (18 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FBGKX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FBGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FBGKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.21 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 70.76 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FBGKX | RGAHX | FBGKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.139 | 9.200 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 353B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.21 | 0.18 | 10,696% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.01 | 43.47 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.76 | 13.78 | 514% |
| Returns for 10 years | 349.47 | 106.68 | 328% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement