Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs FSPGX
FBGRX vs FSPGX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FSPGX
FBGRX vs FSPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. FSPGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Hold and FSPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FSPGX (47.2B). FSPGX pays higher dividends than FBGRX: FSPGX (0.32) vs FBGRX (0.00). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FSPGX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FSPGX (10 years). FBGRX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FSPGX (9.00). FBGRX (0) and FSPGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.13 vs. FSPGX (27.43). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 103.94 vs. FBGRX (80.76).
| FBGRX | FSPGX | FBGRX / FSPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.04 | 1,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.04 | 1,743% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.559 | 8.602 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 47.2B | 218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.13 | 27.43 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.53 | 97.81 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.76 | 103.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 372.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement