Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FBGRX (103B). FBGRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FBGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGRX (39 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.61). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FBGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGRX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.19 vs. RGACX (6.63). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 65.12 vs. RGACX (15.74).
| FBGRX | RGACX | FBGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.380 | 9.232 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 361B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.19 | 6.63 | 455% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.46 | 43.67 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.12 | 15.74 | 414% |
| Returns for 10 years | 371.19 | 107.81 | 344% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers