Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FBGRX (98.6B). FBGRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FBGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGRX (39 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.61). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FBGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGRX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.03 vs. RGACX (0.93). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.59 vs. RGACX (10.91).
| FBGRX | RGACX | FBGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.253 | 5.397 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.6B | 357B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.03 | 0.93 | 2,160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.93 | 33.65 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.59 | 10.91 | 537% |
| Returns for 10 years | 331.18 | 94.42 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers