Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs RGEBX
FBGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs RGEBX
FBGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FBGRX (103B). FBGRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FBGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FBGRX (39 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.61). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FBGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FBGRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.11 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.98 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FBGRX | RGEBX | FBGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.088 | 8.727 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 353B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.11 | -0.77 | -2,470% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.50 | 39.77 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.98 | 9.71 | 721% |
| Returns for 10 years | 347.01 | 97.58 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement