Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs RHGTX
FBGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (43.6B) and RHGTX (43.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBGTX (1.53) and RHGTX (1.47) have matching dividends . FBGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FBGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX (250) and RHGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGTX (7.27) and RHGTX (7.12) have marching annual gain over last year. FBGTX (46.50) and RHGTX (46.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | RHGTX | FBGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.50 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.50 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.833 | -0.836 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 43.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.47 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 7.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 17.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 46.12 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...