Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKWX vs PDBZX
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FBKWX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Z
Price$9.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.92B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.91B
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKWX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKWX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. FBKWX (38.9B). PDBZX (4.65) and FBKWX (4.58) have matching dividends . FBKWX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FBKWX (11 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FBKWX (0.39). FBKWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FBKWX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. PDBZX (4.85). FBKWX return over 5 years is better than : 0.07 vs. PDBZX (-1.32).
| FBKWX | PDBZX | FBKWX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.930 | 2.713 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9B | 48.9B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.58 | 4.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 4.85 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.74 | 10.32 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.07 | -1.32 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.41 | 20.92 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers