Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKWX vs PDBZX
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FBKWX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Z
Price$9.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.03B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.97B
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKWX vs. PDBZX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKWX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48B vs. FBKWX (39B). PDBZX (4.65) and FBKWX (4.54) have matching dividends . FBKWX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FBKWX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FBKWX (0.39). FBKWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FBKWX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKWX (4.55) and PDBZX (4.41) have marching annual gain over last year. FBKWX return over 5 years is better than : 0.04 vs. PDBZX (-0.96).
| FBKWX | PDBZX | FBKWX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.026 | 0.843 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39B | 48B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 4.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | 4.41 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.81 | 6.23 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.04 | -0.96 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.65 | 17.14 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers