Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKWX vs PDBZX
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FBKWX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Z
Price$9.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.12B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.38B
FBKWX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKWX vs. PDBZX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKWX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.4B vs. FBKWX (40.1B). PDBZX (4.60) and FBKWX (4.51) have matching dividends . FBKWX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FBKWX (11 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FBKWX (0.39). FBKWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FBKWX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX (3.91) and FBKWX (3.91) have marching annual gain over last year. FBKWX return over 5 years is better than : 1.31 vs. PDBZX (0.06).
| FBKWX | PDBZX | FBKWX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.618 | 6.635 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 51.4B | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.51 | 4.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.91 | 3.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.55 | 14.65 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | 0.06 | 2,281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.94 | 23.83 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement