Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBLAX vs HBLRX
FBLAX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FBLAX vs HBLRX
FBLAX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBLAX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBLAX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FBLAX (3.39B). FBLAX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FBLAX (4.31) vs HBLRX (2.74). FBLAX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FBLAX (20 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FBLAX (0.91). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FBLAX (42.27). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBLAX: HBLRX (0) vs FBLAX (1000). FBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. HBLRX (1.14). FBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.40 vs. HBLRX (2.70).
| FBLAX | HBLRX | FBLAX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.27 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.27 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.817 | 3.434 | 169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 10.8B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 2.74 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 1.14 | 804% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 18.19 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.40 | 2.70 | 720% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.50 | 33.72 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement