Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBLAX vs RLBCX
FBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FBLAX vs RLBCX
FBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBLAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBLAX (3.44B). FBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FBLAX (4.27) vs RLBCX (1.52). FBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FBLAX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). FBLAX (0.91) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBLAX (42.27). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBLAX: RLBCX (250) vs FBLAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. FBLAX (13.28). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.04 vs. FBLAX (20.30).
| FBLAX | RLBCX | FBLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.082 | 8.868 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 1.52 | 281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.28 | 14.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 42.42 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.30 | 33.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.18 | 86.60 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement