Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBLEX vs RMEBX
FBLEX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FBLEX vs RMEBX
FBLEX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBLEX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBLEX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FBLEX (16.7B). FBLEX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FBLEX (1.64) vs RMEBX (1.00). FBLEX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FBLEX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FBLEX (0.00). FBLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FBLEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FBLEX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FBLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.61 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. FBLEX (15.04).
| FBLEX | RMEBX | FBLEX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 9.059 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 118B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.00 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.61 | 8.73 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.19 | 34.30 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.04 | 36.28 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.17 | 89.36 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers