Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs HBLRX
FBMCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs HBLRX
FBMCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FBMCX (3.46B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FBMCX (3.60) vs HBLRX (2.76). FBMCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FBMCX (20 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: HBLRX (0) vs FBMCX (1000). FBMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. HBLRX (4.41). FBMCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.75 vs. HBLRX (4.10).
| FBMCX | HBLRX | FBMCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.27 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.27 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.573 | 5.791 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 11.2B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 2.76 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.61 | 4.41 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.46 | 19.93 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.75 | 4.10 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.43 | 35.22 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement