Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs RLBAX
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs RLBAX
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FBMCX (3.46B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBMCX (3.60) vs RLBAX (1.13). FBMCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBMCX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: RLBAX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). FBMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. RLBAX (10.40). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.89 vs. FBMCX (17.34).
| FBMCX | RLBAX | FBMCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.573 | 9.474 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 1.13 | 319% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.07 | 10.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 41.22 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 28.89 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.19 | 74.92 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers