Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs RLBAX
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs RLBAX
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBMCX (3.43B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBMCX (3.57) vs RLBAX (1.14). FBMCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBMCX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: RLBAX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. FBMCX (12.37). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.64 vs. FBMCX (16.81).
| FBMCX | RLBAX | FBMCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.732 | 8.637 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.14 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 13.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.77 | 40.52 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 30.64 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.68 | 81.17 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement