Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.39M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.19
Change+$0.17 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. FBOGX (836M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.44) vs RSLBX (0.06). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. FBOGX (1.28). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : 13.84 vs. RSLBX (8.08).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.806 | 10.866 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 80.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.06 | 2,474% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 8.90 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.96 | 29.02 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.84 | 8.08 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.80 | 44.25 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement