Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$55.86
Change+$0.17 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. FBOGX (771M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.60) vs RSLBX (0.02). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.11 vs. FBOGX (-4.49). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : 24.20 vs. RSLBX (17.78).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.903 | -2.034 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.02 | 8,010% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | -1.11 | 403% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 16.00 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.20 | 17.78 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.42 | 20.93 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers