Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.44
Change+$0.81 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.54B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.5B vs. FBOGX (766M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.42) vs RSLBX (0.06). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.04 vs. FBOGX (-3.14). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : -2.17 vs. FBOGX (-5.36).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.688 | 9.551 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 79.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.06 | 2,547% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.14 | 5.04 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.34 | 27.49 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.36 | -2.17 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.56 | 42.12 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers