Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.50
Change-$0.15 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.39M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$57.03
Change-$1.30 (-2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. FBOGX (830M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLBX (0.15). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBOGX (12.85). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). FBOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. RSLBX (0.81). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.12 vs. FBOGX (4.91).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.211 | 0.018 | 1,203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 830M | 74.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.15 | 957% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 0.81 | 328% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.45 | -1.01 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.91 | 7.12 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.86 | 29.63 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...