Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$8.49
Change-$0.49 (-5.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.66M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.57
Change-$2.46 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. FBOGX (773M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.57) vs RSLBX (0.02). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). FBOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.33 vs. RSLBX (-5.77). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.49 vs. RSLBX (42.96).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.118 | -5.244 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 69.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.02 | 7,742% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -5.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.91 | -8.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 42.96 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.96 | 19.93 | 20% |