Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets817.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.10
Change-$0.68 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.2B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. FBOGX (817M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLBX (0.06). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. FBOGX (0.09). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : 8.19 vs. RSLBX (4.24).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.540 | 10.709 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 817M | 82.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.06 | 2,486% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 7.85 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.91 | 39.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.19 | 4.24 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.96 | 46.00 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement