Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$57.70
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. FBOGX (849M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLBX (0.15). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBOGX (12.85). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.44 vs. FBOGX (3.10). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 11.20 vs. FBOGX (2.40).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.665 | 2.798 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 74.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.15 | 957% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 3.44 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.22 | -14.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | 11.20 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.04 | 36.03 | 42% |