Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.31M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.95
Change+$0.29 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.11B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. FBOGX (804M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.44) vs RSLFX (0.86). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. FBOGX (3.82). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.16 vs. FBOGX (12.09).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.954 | 8.738 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 804M | 79.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.86 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 15.38 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.80 | 24.05 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.09 | 16.16 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.56 | 54.26 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement