Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$69.61
Change+$0.21 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. FBOGX (771M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.60) vs RSLFX (0.93). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.06 vs. FBOGX (-4.49). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.54 vs. FBOGX (24.20).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.903 | -1.667 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.93 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | -0.06 | 7,547% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 19.40 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.20 | 26.54 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.42 | 40.19 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers