Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$71.62
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. FBOGX (849M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLFX (0.87). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBOGX (12.85). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. FBOGX (3.10). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. FBOGX (2.40).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.665 | 3.861 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 74.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.87 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 4.52 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.22 | -12.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | 19.45 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.04 | 57.68 | 26% |