Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.50
Change-$0.15 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.39M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$70.91
Change-$1.61 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. FBOGX (830M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLFX (0.87). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBOGX (12.85). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). FBOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. RSLFX (1.86). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.10 vs. FBOGX (4.91).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.211 | 0.170 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 830M | 74.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.87 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 1.86 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.45 | 1.92 | -180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.91 | 15.10 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.86 | 50.27 | 26% |