Ad is loading...
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$8.49
Change-$0.49 (-5.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.66M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$64.20
Change-$3.06 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. FBOGX (773M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.57) vs RSLFX (0.95). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.78 vs. FBOGX (-5.33). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.55 vs. FBOGX (45.49).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.118 | -4.987 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 69.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -4.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.91 | -5.37 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 53.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.96 | 39.00 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers