Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets817.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$78.98
Change-$0.85 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.2B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. FBOGX (817M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.39) vs RSLFX (0.83). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. FBOGX (0.09). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. FBOGX (8.19).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.540 | 11.606 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 817M | 82.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.83 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 8.98 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.91 | 44.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.19 | 11.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.96 | 69.25 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers