Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. FBOGX (811M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.52) vs RSLFX (0.84). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). FBOGX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.73 vs. FBOGX (14.58). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.01 vs. FBOGX (-10.21).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.471 | 14.428 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 811M | 91.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.84 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 20.73 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.06 | 41.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.21 | -2.01 | 509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.31 | 108.64 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement