Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs SCWCX
FBOGX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs SCWCX
FBOGX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. SCWCX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and SCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. FBOGX (822M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: FBOGX (1.51) vs SCWCX (0.12). FBOGX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: FBOGX (13 years) vs SCWCX (25 years). SCWCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.98). SCWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: SCWCX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. FBOGX (9.30). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : -8.08 vs. SCWCX (-8.84).
| FBOGX | SCWCX | FBOGX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.822 | 14.057 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 822M | 89B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.12 | 1,248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 12.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.87 | 36.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.08 | -8.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.78 | 62.19 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers