Ad is loading...
FBOT vs FWD
FBOT vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts FBOT vs FWD
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$28.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$105
Net Assets103.99M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$80.96
Change+$0.31 (+0.38%)
Volume$226
Net Assets657.09M
FBOT vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOT vs. FWD commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOT is a Buy and FWD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 657M vs. FBOT (104M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: FBOT (2.294) vs FWD (1.844). FBOT was incepted earlier than FWD: FBOT (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). FBOT (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover FBOT (52.00) vs FBOT (52.00).
| FBOT | FWD | FBOT / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | 1.844 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 104M | 657M | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 163.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBOT | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +1.87% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 76% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 71% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| SNPS - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| ADSK - FBOT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| PTC - FBOT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +2.30% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +4.66% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||