Ad is loading...
FBOT vs FWD
FBOT vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts FBOT vs FWD
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$24.43
Change-$0.63 (-2.51%)
Volume$157
Net Assets88.11M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$66.68
Change-$3.11 (-4.46%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets484.19M
FBOT vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOT vs. FWD commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOT is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 484M vs. FBOT (88.1M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: FBOT (-11.013) vs FWD (-11.870). FBOT was incepted earlier than FWD: FBOT (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). FBOT (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover FBOT (52.00) vs FBOT (52.00).
| FBOT | FWD | FBOT / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | -11.013 | -11.870 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 88.1M | 484M | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 163.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBOT | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +9.91% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 76% Closely correlated | +16.82% | ||
| SNPS - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | +9.88% | ||
| ADSK - FBOT | 63% Loosely correlated | +10.34% | ||
| PTC - FBOT | 60% Loosely correlated | +9.13% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +12.42% | ||
| APH - FWD | 81% Closely correlated | +10.17% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
More | ||||