Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOT vs FWD
FBOT vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts FBOT vs FWD
FBOT vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOT vs. FWD commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOT is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.1B vs. FBOT (215M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than FBOT: FWD (42.553) vs FBOT (17.909). FBOT was incepted earlier than FWD: FBOT (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). FBOT (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover FBOT (33.00) vs FBOT (33.00).
| FBOT | FWD | FBOT / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 17.909 | 42.553 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 215M | 3.1B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 196.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.08 | 703% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBOT | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | +4.36% | ||
| ST - FBOT | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ROK - FBOT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 81% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 74% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||