Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOT vs TMFG
FBOT vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts FBOT vs TMFG
FBOT vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOT vs. TMFG commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOT is a Buy and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 359M vs. FBOT (220M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: FBOT (19.757) vs TMFG (5.304). FBOT was incepted earlier than TMFG: FBOT (6 years) vs TMFG (12 years). FBOT (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). FBOT (15.00) and TMFG (15.00) have matching turnover.
| FBOT | TMFG | FBOT / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.757 | 5.304 | 372% |
| Net Assets | 220M | 359M | 61% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 15.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.26 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBOT | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ST - FBOT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| TSLA - FBOT | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| ROK - FBOT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| JLL - TMFG | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| PYPL - TMFG | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| PAYC - TMFG | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| MDT - TMFG | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RMD - TMFG | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||