FBP
Price
$19.40
Change
-$0.71 (-3.53%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
65 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$56.82
Change
-$1.30 (-2.24%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4B
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FBP vs HWC

Header iconFBP vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FBP vs HWCBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$19.40
Change-$0.71 (-3.53%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization2.93B
Hancock Whitney
Price$56.82
Change-$1.30 (-2.24%)
Volume$561.77K
Capitalization4B
FBP vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBP vs. HWC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBP is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FBP: $19.40 vs. HWC: $56.82)
Brand notoriety: FBP and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBP: 137% vs. HWC: 88%
Market capitalization -- FBP: $2.93B vs. HWC: $4B
FBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.93B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than FBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than FBP.

Price Growth

FBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.09% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than FBP($2.94B). FBP (10.12) and HWC (9.98) have similar P/E ratio . FBP YTD gains are higher at: 5.300 vs. HWC (3.838). FBP has less debt than HWC: FBP (662M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than FBP: HWC (1.37B) vs FBP (897M).
FBPHWCFBP / HWC
Capitalization2.94B4B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.3003.838138%
P/E Ratio10.129.98101%
Revenue897M1.37B66%
Total CashN/A561M-
Total Debt662M1.52B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBP vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FBP
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1134
SMR RATING
1..100
1110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (86). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (34). This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (11). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (56). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (38). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIRAX72.44-0.26
-0.36%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529A
OSMNX35.59-0.20
-0.56%
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
DPWRX68.91-0.78
-1.12%
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth I
FTVFX33.96-0.70
-2.02%
Fidelity Advisor Value M
SPSCX19.35-0.42
-2.12%
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq Intl

FBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBP has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBP jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBP
1D Price
Change %
FBP100%
-2.66%
NWBI - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
OFG - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
HWC - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
WSFS - FBP
84%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
BPOP - FBP
84%
Closely correlated
-3.15%
More