FBP
Price
$19.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.93B
84 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$52.25
Change
+$1.42 (+2.79%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FBP vs HWC

Header iconFBP vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FBP vs HWCBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$19.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$24.93K
Capitalization2.93B
Hancock Whitney
Price$52.25
Change+$1.42 (+2.79%)
Volume$13.48K
Capitalization4B
FBP vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBP vs. HWC commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBP is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FBP: $19.58 vs. HWC: $52.30)
Brand notoriety: FBP and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBP: 101% vs. HWC: 63%
Market capitalization -- FBP: $2.93B vs. HWC: $4B
FBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.93B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FBP and HWC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.29% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than FBP($2.94B). FBP (10.12) and HWC (9.98) have similar P/E ratio . FBP YTD gains are higher at: 6.168 vs. HWC (-3.627). FBP has less debt than HWC: FBP (662M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than FBP: HWC (1.37B) vs FBP (897M).
FBPHWCFBP / HWC
Capitalization2.94B4B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.168-3.627-170%
P/E Ratio10.129.98101%
Revenue897M1.37B66%
Total CashN/A561M-
Total Debt662M1.52B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBP vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FBP
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
623
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (80). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (23). This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (8). This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (57). This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (53). This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TUGN20.670.40
+1.96%
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
ERTH39.220.47
+1.21%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
TVE23.300.03
+0.13%
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029
PFFA20.150.02
+0.10%
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF
UTWO48.44-0.06
-0.11%
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF

FBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBP has been closely correlated with BPOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBP jumps, then BPOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBP
1D Price
Change %
FBP100%
+4.82%
BPOP - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+5.93%
WSFS - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
HWC - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
NWBI - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
FFBC - FBP
84%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+2.89%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.55%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
More