Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBRNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FBRNX (11B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FBRNX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FBRNX (0.37). FBRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FBRNX (14 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FBRNX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBRNX (13.00). FBRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FBRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FBRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. RGAFX (4.67). FBRNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.89 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| FBRNX | RGAFX | FBRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.858 | 7.299 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | 4.67 | 550% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.11 | 40.73 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.89 | 17.46 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.36 | 105.95 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement