Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBRNX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FBRNX (10.8B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FBRNX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FBRNX (0.37). FBRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FBRNX (14 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FBRNX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBRNX (13.00). FBRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FBRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FBRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.38 vs. RGAFX (8.96). FBRNX return over 5 years is better than : 65.70 vs. RGAFX (17.20).
| FBRNX | RGAFX | FBRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.514 | 6.478 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.38 | 8.96 | 339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.25 | 46.79 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.70 | 17.20 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 228.35 | 116.72 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement