Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBRNX vs RGAFX
FBRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBRNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FBRNX (11.3B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FBRNX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FBRNX (0.36). FBRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FBRNX (14 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FBRNX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBRNX (13.00). FBRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FBRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FBRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RGAFX (-0.06). FBRNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.90 vs. RGAFX (13.48).
| FBRNX | RGAFX | FBRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.082 | 8.568 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.46 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | -0.06 | -31,644% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.04 | 44.42 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.90 | 13.48 | 459% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.34 | 106.60 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement