Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBRNX vs RGAGX
FBRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FBRNX vs RGAGX
FBRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBRNX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FBRNX (11.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FBRNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FBRNX (0.36). FBRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FBRNX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FBRNX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBRNX (13.00). FBRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FBRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FBRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RGAGX (0.01). FBRNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.90 vs. RGAGX (13.74).
| FBRNX | RGAGX | FBRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.29 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.29 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.082 | 8.614 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.51 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 0.01 | 216,531% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.04 | 44.69 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.90 | 13.74 | 451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.34 | 107.06 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement