Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSOX vs. SCICX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSOX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. FBSOX (1.02B). FBSOX pays higher dividends than SCICX: FBSOX (0.15) vs SCICX (0.00). FBSOX was incepted earlier than SCICX: FBSOX (28 years) vs SCICX (27 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBSOX (0.65). FBSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). FBSOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: FBSOX (0) vs SCICX (2000). SCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.10 vs. FBSOX (-26.76). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : 7.97 vs. FBSOX (-58.59).
| FBSOX | SCICX | FBSOX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.740 | 53.163 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 28.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.76 | 66.10 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.18 | 50.89 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.59 | 7.97 | -735% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.16 | 86.04 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement