Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSOX vs. SCICX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSOX is a Buy and SCICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FBSOX (993M). FBSOX pays higher dividends than SCICX: FBSOX (0.15) vs SCICX (0.00). FBSOX was incepted earlier than SCICX: FBSOX (29 years) vs SCICX (27 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBSOX (0.65). FBSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). FBSOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: FBSOX (0) vs SCICX (2000). SCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.29 vs. FBSOX (-19.34). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -1.26 vs. FBSOX (-57.41).
| FBSOX | SCICX | FBSOX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.302 | 45.597 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 27.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.34 | 41.29 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.32 | 36.03 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.41 | -1.26 | 4,574% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.53 | 66.99 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement