Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts FBSOX vs SCICX
FBSOX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSOX vs. SCICX commentary
Aug 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSOX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. FBSOX (1.04B). FBSOX pays higher dividends than SCICX: FBSOX (0.14) vs SCICX (0.00). FBSOX was incepted earlier than SCICX: FBSOX (29 years) vs SCICX (27 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBSOX (0.65). FBSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). FBSOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: FBSOX (0) vs SCICX (2000). SCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.05 vs. FBSOX (-13.52). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : 4.56 vs. FBSOX (-54.61).
| FBSOX | SCICX | FBSOX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.917 | 51.515 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 28.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.52 | 45.05 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.30 | 53.89 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.61 | 4.56 | -1,197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.71 | 67.98 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers