Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs GGHCX
FBTAX vs GGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs GGHCX
FBTAX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. GGHCX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. GGHCX (1.16B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FBTAX (1.13) vs GGHCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs GGHCX (37 years). GGHCX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (6%) and GGHCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FBTAX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.42 vs. GGHCX (4.49). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.43 vs. GGHCX (-18.42).
| FBTAX | GGHCX | FBTAX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.594 | -2.607 | -176% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 1.16B | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.42 | 4.49 | 1,102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.74 | 6.79 | 909% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.43 | -18.42 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.00 | 12.00 | 958% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement