Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs JFNCX
FBTAX vs JFNCX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs JFNCX
FBTAX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. JFNCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFNCX has more cash in the bank: 6.03B vs. FBTAX (2.43B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FBTAX (0.91) vs JFNCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FBTAX (26 years) vs JFNCX (17 years). JFNCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FBTAX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.71 vs. JFNCX (23.17). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.13 vs. JFNCX (9.34).
| FBTAX | JFNCX | FBTAX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.259 | 8.134 | 347% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 6.03B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.71 | 23.17 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.68 | 21.95 | 477% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.13 | 9.34 | 494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.86 | 59.11 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement