Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs JFNCX
FBTAX vs JFNCX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs JFNCX
FBTAX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. JFNCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFNCX has more cash in the bank: 5.28B vs. FBTAX (1.9B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FBTAX (1.13) vs JFNCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs JFNCX (17 years). JFNCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FBTAX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.10 vs. JFNCX (18.41). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.40 vs. JFNCX (4.09).
| FBTAX | JFNCX | FBTAX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.297 | -3.955 | -58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 5.28B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.10 | 18.41 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.94 | 8.43 | 711% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.40 | 4.09 | 719% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.09 | 42.81 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement