Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. LHCCX (8.19M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCCX (74.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. FBTAX (-4.28). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.89 vs. FBTAX (0.89).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.654 | 4.837 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 8.19M | 18,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.28 | 5.07 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 16.35 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.89 | 14.89 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers