Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. LHCCX (7.6M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (2.59) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). FBTAX (-6.70) and LHCCX (-6.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.90 vs. LHCCX (-2.94).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.09 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.230 | 0.489 | 2,705% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 7.6M | 19,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.70 | -6.71 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.31 | 12.20 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.90 | -2.94 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement