Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LHCCX (7.15M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (2.97) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.28) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.62 vs. FBTAX (-23.65). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.02 vs. FBTAX (-11.38).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.28 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.964 | -13.859 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 7.15M | 19,465% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.65 | -13.62 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.29 | -14.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.38 | 6.02 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...