Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. LHCCX (8.85M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (0.99) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (26 years) vs LHCCX (7 years). LHCCX (4.23) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.58 vs. LHCCX (25.92). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.31 vs. LHCCX (10.59).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.23 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.407 | 6.983 | 421% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 8.85M | 24,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.58 | 25.92 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.25 | 38.18 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.31 | 10.59 | 532% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers