Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCFX
FBTAX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. LHCFX (8.85M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCFX: FBTAX (2.16) vs LHCFX (0.41). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). LHCFX (3.19) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.98 vs. LHCFX (14.48). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.88 vs. LHCFX (10.72).
| FBTAX | LHCFX | FBTAX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.19 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.831 | 17.629 | 232% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 8.85M | 19,670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.41 | 532% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.98 | 14.48 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.86 | 33.01 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.88 | 10.72 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement