Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCFX
FBTAX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. LHCFX (8.19M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCFX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCFX (74.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. FBTAX (-4.28). LHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.87 vs. FBTAX (0.89).
| FBTAX | LHCFX | FBTAX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.654 | 2.990 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 8.19M | 18,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.28 | 4.02 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 17.55 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.89 | 18.87 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.36 | N/A | - |