Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCFX
FBTAX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCFX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. LHCFX (7.51M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCFX: FBTAX (2.74) vs LHCFX (0.48). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). LHCFX (3.19) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.48 vs. FBTAX (-7.27). LHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.82 vs. FBTAX (1.30).
| FBTAX | LHCFX | FBTAX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.19 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.886 | 2.268 | 436% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 7.51M | 18,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.48 | 569% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.27 | -4.48 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.25 | 17.21 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.30 | 5.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.01 | N/A | - |