Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCFX
FBTAX vs LHCFX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs LHCFX
FBTAX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. LHCFX (9.12M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCFX: FBTAX (0.99) vs LHCFX (0.24). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FBTAX (26 years) vs LHCFX (7 years). LHCFX (3.33) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.51 vs. LHCFX (29.60). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.32 vs. LHCFX (18.23).
| FBTAX | LHCFX | FBTAX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.802 | 10.600 | 328% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 9.12M | 24,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.24 | 412% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.51 | 29.60 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.70 | 45.50 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.32 | 18.23 | 325% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers