Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCQX
FBTAX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCQX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. LHCQX (7.64M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCQX: FBTAX (2.59) vs LHCQX (0.34). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCQX (6 years). LHCQX (3.59) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.29 vs. LHCQX (-3.36). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.86 vs. LHCQX (1.06).
| FBTAX | LHCQX | FBTAX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.59 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.134 | 1.430 | 1,128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 7.64M | 19,139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.34 | 767% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | -3.36 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.75 | 23.55 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.86 | 1.06 | 457% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement