Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCQX
FBTAX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCQX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. LHCQX (8.64M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCQX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCQX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCQX (6 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCQX (74.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.39 vs. FBTAX (-2.60). LHCQX return over 5 years is better than : 24.48 vs. FBTAX (7.41).
| FBTAX | LHCQX | FBTAX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.772 | 4.555 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 8.64M | 18,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | 10.39 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | 15.01 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | 24.48 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | N/A | - |