Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCQX
FBTAX vs LHCQX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs LHCQX
FBTAX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCQX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a StrongBuy and LHCQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. LHCQX (8.74M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCQX: FBTAX (0.98) vs LHCQX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FBTAX (26 years) vs LHCQX (7 years). LHCQX (3.73) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.16 vs. LHCQX (29.32). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. LHCQX (14.09).
| FBTAX | LHCQX | FBTAX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.73 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.145 | 5.099 | 474% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 8.74M | 25,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.16 | 29.32 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.08 | 29.81 | 326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 14.09 | 359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers